Skip to main content

I'm promiscuous. How about you?

I am often reading several books at a time. I call this book-hopping and I got into the habit when I was in college. Thing is: People don't seem to think it's normal. In fact I often get asked how I manage not to get confused and mix up all the plots and characters.

Here's a common occurrence chez moi:

In the loo I'm currently reading 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die. I started reading it 2014 and expect to finish it in 2017. After than I'll probably read 1.000 Places You must See Before You Die.

I usually keep books of articles and essays in the kitchen that I grab to get my reading fix with my breakfast whenever I haven't brought in another book that I'm carrying around between rooms. Currently, however, I'm reading The Boy's Book of Survival (How to Survive Anything, Anywhere).

I might be reading a novel and a travelogue by turns in the bedroom and living room. In addition I always have a book or two loaded into my smartphone for reading in the queue at those unhappy times when I have to go shopping for food during rush hour.

That makes five active reads, but I have had as many as ten books on the go at once, and back in college I sometimes juggled that number of school books in addition to one or two leisure reads. If you were to count all the books strewn around my apartment with bookmarks sticking out of them you might think I have as many as thirty books on the go, but I only count books I have read something in at least once in the past week, whereas some of the bookmarked books have lain untouched for a year or more. I guess this makes me a promiscuous reader.

I seldom get confused, and that is only on the rare occasion when I accidentally start reading two very similar books, for example with a similar story background or lead characters with the same or similar names. The trick, if there is one, is to never read two books of the same genre or by the same author at the same time.

Mind you, I don‘t do this all the time. I might have, say, four books going, but if one of them suddenly becomes too absorbing to put down, I will put the others aside and concentrate on that one book to the end. I might also go through periods when I only read monogamously for weeks or months on end, but I eventually will move back into the wondrous polygamy of book-hopping.

The advantage of book-hopping over reading one at a time is variety. I could be simultaneously enjoying a travelogue from Africa, reading a novel and learning about Japanese cuisine, but the downside is that it can interfere with continuity and make it difficult to become really absorbed in a book.

So, dear reader: Are you a promiscuous or a monogamous reader, or somewhere in-between?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...