Skip to main content

Review: April Lady by Georgette Heyer

Genre: Historical romance; Regency romance.
Themes: Marriage problems, love, misunderstandings (big mis, no less), gambling, damsels in distress. 
Reading challenge: What's in a Name 2016
Challenge book no.: 3/6, a book with the name of a month in the title.

First I must say that when I was looking for a picture of the cover of the edition I read, I found so many nice ones that I decided to post several. The one on the left is the cover I was looking for and you will find the rest below. This one and the next one (from the original hard-cover edition) are my favourites. 

If you know anything about fashion history you will soon spot the errors in some of the cover images (e.g. too early, too late), and if you have read the book, you will spot more (wrong hair-colour, events that did not take place in the story).

This is a story that hinges on one of those plot elements that I hate: the big misunderstanding. It doesn't help that there is also a spoiled, wilful and rather stupid young woman involved (not the heroine, although she can be pretty silly sometimes) who nearly destroys the heroine and hero's chance of happiness together with her selfishness. 

The plot begins with my lady having to confess that she is over her ears in debt. She doesn't admit that it's because she lent her profligate brother money but instead lets her husband think it's because she has been gambling. This strengthens his belief in the big misunderstanding, i.e. his belief that she married him to save her family from financial ruin; and her belief that he married her because he had a duty to marry, and not for love. Both are wrong, and it seems everyone around them sees it, but not them. Mind you, these are people who live in the same house, see each other every day, and presumably occasionally have sex.This makes April Lady one of those romances in which the falling in love has taken place when the story begins and the plot is about the people involved finding out they are loved back. I like those kinds of stories, but...

Okay I'll come right out and say it: This is definitely not one of Heyer's best. There are pages and pages of conversations that don't have the sparkle and humour that can be found in some of her other books, the main characters are strangely colourless, and the supporting cast might have been borrowed straight out of a couple of her other books. The only reason I slogged through this was because it was part of a reading challenge and I didn't have a whole lot of other books to choose from. 

Apparently, Heyer herself thought the book was terrible. I'm not quite that merciless - I just find it dull and annoying - but I will certainly not be reading it again, and I think I will cull it from my collection. By the way, the review I linked to above goes into the plot and the reasons why it wasn't very good, in depth. I recommend it.

If you have read this book, do you agree with my opinion of it?
If you haven't read it, would you read it based on this review, or would you avoid it?


Popular posts from this blog

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down

List love: 10 recommended stories with cross-dressing characters

This trope is almost as old as literature, what with Achilles, Hercules and Athena all cross-dressing in the Greek myths, Thor and Odin disguising themselves as women in the Norse myths, and Arjuna doing the same in the Mahabaratha. In modern times it is most common in romance novels, especially historicals in which a heroine often spends part of the book disguised as a boy, the hero sometimes falling for her while thinking she is a boy. Occasionally a hero will cross-dress, using a female disguise to avoid recognition or to gain access to someplace where he would never be able to go as a man. However, the trope isn’t just found in romances, as may be seen in the list below, in which I recommend stories with a variety of cross-dressing characters. Unfortunately I was only able to dredge up from the depths of my memory two book-length stories I had read in which men cross-dress, so this is mostly a list of women dressed as men. Ghost Riders by Sharyn McCrumb. One of the interwove

First book of 2020: The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel by Deborah Moggach (reading notes)

I don't know if I've mentioned it before, but I loathe movie tie-in book covers because I feel they are (often) trying to tell me how I should see the characters in the book. The edition of Deborah Moggach's These Foolish Things that I read takes it one step further and changes the title of the book into the title of the film version as well as having photos of the ensemble cast on the cover. Fortunately it has been a long while since I watched the movie, so I couldn't even remember who played whom in the film, and I think it's perfectly understandable to try to cash in on the movie's success by rebranding the book. Even with a few years between watching the film and reading the book, I could see that the story had been altered, e.g. by having the Marigold Hotel's owner/manager be single and having a romance, instead being of unhappily married to an (understandably, I thought) shrewish wife. It also conflates Sonny, the wheeler dealer behind the retireme