Skip to main content

Orchid Fever, by Eric Hansen

I just realised I got through the whole of April without writing a single review, and yet I posted something nearly every day of the month. This has to be a record for me. Of course there were reviews, but they were recycled ones that I wrote years go.

Full title: Orchid Fever: A Horticultural Tale of Love, Lust, and Lunacy
Year published: 2000
Genre: Non-fiction, travel, history, flowers

I came across this book at a second hand shop a couple of years ago and was intrigued by the title. I then stuck it in the dreaded TBR stack and forgot about it, until last month when I was browsing my TBR for something to read. I promptly picked it up, started reading, and was soon engrossed in the world of orchids and orchid people.

Hansen immersed himself deeply in the orchid world, interviewing collectors, breeders and horticulturists, and obsessively hunting down some collector/breeders who had run afoul of the catch-22 of the CITES convention: in order to own and sell orchids on the CITES list, you had to have CITES papers, but if your orchids were acquired before CITES, when no papers were needed, you would be treated as a criminal, just in case you had acquired them illegally. He points out some major flaws in the CITES convention as regards flora (especially that it makes things hard for scientists and forbids the rescue of plants from habitat that’s about to be destroyed), and relates his attempts to get a handle on the apparent idiocy of some of the CITES rules, but seems to have run into obstacles everywhere. The part of the book that deals with this does drag somewhat, as Hansen gets repetitive and even ranty on the subject at times, but it is enlivened by the portraits of the people he met while researching that part.

Interestingly, the people who were most inclined to talk to him about this situation and answer questions were the people one would have expected to not want to talk: people who had been “made examples of” with confiscation of orchids, fines and jail sentences for possession of illegal orchids, apparently in order to scare others, whereas the people most closely involved in CITES couldn’t or wouldn’t give him much information.

Therefore the book gives a rather one-sided view of this subject. I would love to see something on this subject from the point of view of the CITES people, if anyone can point me in the right direction.

But Hansen doesn’ just write about the apparent idiocy of CITES, he also gives a lot of interesting information and historical tidbits that he peppers the text with in such a way that it never gets boring.  The highlights of the book are the portraits of orchid people and orchids, some of which are very funny and always entertaining, even if sometimes in a “goodness me!” kind of way. I would have liked to see colour photos of the orchids he mentions, as there are only line drawings in the book, and I spent quite a lot of time searching for photos on the Web so I could truly understand what he was describing when discussing orchids. This disrupted my reading somewhat.

This book is well written and gives a look into a world that seems to be inhabited mostly by eccentrics and fanatics (quote: "I don't want to give the impression that perfectly normal, healthy, thoughtful and balanced people are not drawn to orchids. I am told they exist. I just didn't have much luck finding them."), some lovable and some not. It is also interesting to follow his development from interested observer to full fledged fanatic through the course of the book, although in his case he didn’t start collecting orchids, but orchid people. 4 stars.

Comments

George said…
Of course the greatest orchid fanatic was Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe. On a different topic, I just read a wonderful review of CLASSICS & TRANSLATION. Here's the link if you're interested: http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Classic-Carne-Ross-7028. I've badgered my college library into ordering the book. Sounds great!
Bibliophile said…
Thanks for the link, George.

Nero Wolfe is downright normal compared with some of the characters Hansen encountered while writing the book.

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...