Skip to main content

Reading report for February 2010

I finished 15 books in February. 4 were crime novels, 6 were romances, 7 were historical.

A special mention must be made of The Song of Bhagavad-Gita. It is a chapter from the great Hindu epic, The Mahabarata, where Krishna, one of the many manifestations of God in Hinduism, explains religious philosophy to Prince Arjuna on the eve of a great battle. I don’t know how accurate the translation is, since I don’t know Sanskrit, but I do know that it is beautiful and mixes prose and verse in a nicely balanced way. It took me nearly three months to read it, as it soon became apparent that it needed to be read slowly and each chapter thoroughly digested before moving on. I can’t say that much of its message stuck, but I do know that after reading a chapter – always at bedtime – I would have a wonderfully restful night’s sleep, because it had such a soothing and calming effect on my mind.

Challenge count:
Top mysteries: 0
Global Reading Challenge: 1
Bibliophilic Book Challenge: 2
TBR Challenge: 8

Rereads: 2
Icelandic books: 2

The Books:
Maggie Black & Deirdre Le Faye: The Jane Austen Cookbook (historical cookery book)
Agatha Christie:After the Funeral (murder mystery)
Jennifer Crusie: Welcome to Temptation (romance)
Jennifer Crusie & Bob Mayer: Agnes and the Hitman (romantic thriller)
Halldór Laxness: Úngfrúin góða og Húsið (historical novel)
J.J. Marric: Gideon's Month (police procedural)
Orhan Pamuk: The White Castle (historical novel)
Ellis Peters: St. Peter's Fair (historical mystery)
Julia Quinn: When he was Wicked and It's in his Kiss (historical romance)
Nora Roberts: Irish Rebel and Sullivan's Woman (romance)
Unknown: The Song of Bhagavad-Gita (religious philosophy)
Jason Wilson (series ed.) & Ian Frazier (book ed.): The Best American Travel Writing 2003 (travel articles)
Yrsa Sigurðardóttir: Aska (murder mystery)


Tentative reading plan for March:
I didn’t make any headway with the Top Mysteries challenge in February, but intend to do better this month. I have started reading The Anatomy of a Murder and will review it as soon as I finish it. I also have another book on the list lined up which I may even finish before Anatomy... because it's short enough to read in one session.

In the Global reading Challenge I am halfway through The Mulatta and Mister Fly by Miguel Angel Asturias, an entertaining, magical picaresque novel set in the author’s native country, Guatemala. I will have to finish it soon, because I must return it to the library in 10 days time.

For the Bibliophilic challenge I want to get my hands on The Book Thief by Markus Zusak. It remains to be seen if I am successful, as it is very popular and I am planning to get it from the library. Just because a copy is available right now, when the library is closed, doesn’t mean it will be after I finish work tomorrow.

I have the latest crime novel by Arnaldur Indriðason lined up and plan to read it soon.

And finally I would like to try to get my hands on more of Julia Quinn’s Bridgerton romances, having read 2 of them in February and liked them very much.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'm very interested in the content of your blog, but really can't stand to read it for more than a few minutes because of the terrible user-unfriendly red background, white
text. I don't think a blog should be difficult to read; there's a reason books have white pages, black text, (and red is my favorite color for almost everything else!). Please reconsider; a good blog doesn't need to be eye-catching. mso.
Bibliophile said…
Thanks for the feedback. I occasionally fiddle around with the colours of the blog and this kind of input is invaluable for finding the right balance between readability and style.
Incidentally, if you use the Firefox browser and come across a web page that you find difficult to read because of the colours, you can click "view", choose "page style" and then "no style", which should give you basic black type on a white page.

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...