Skip to main content

Book 5: Erotica Universalis by Gilles Néret (review)

As the title suggests, this is a collection of erotica - paintings and drawings to be precise.

The title is misleading - the imagery is nearly all of European or North American origin and almost exclusively pertains to heterosexual sexual acts by white people. Nothing universal about that.

I would also call the "erotica" in the title misleading, as a lot of the imagery is, to my mind, pornographic rather than erotic. I know the two terms are used interchangeably by some and that other's definitions of them differ, but I associate erotica with beauty and sensuality and often also playfulness, being more suggestive than directly, in-your-face sexual. Erotica arouses one's sense of beauty as well as being sexually arousing, while porn has a cruder aesthetic and more directly appeals to the sexual appetite and shows sexual acts directly, leaving little to the imagination instead of giving the viewer leeway to imagine things

Now, porn has its place just like erotica and, like I said earlier, people's definitions of the two are different, so I'm not going to quibble any further about that.

What I would complain about in this case is the choices of the compiler to include so many images from the same book/publication/artist with barely changing scenes, and continuing on that theme with more of the same, just by another artist. Such lack of variety is annoying when there is so much good erotic and pornographic art out there. After a while you just stop perusing the images and just keep turning the pages in search of something different.

There are a handful of fetish and non-hetero images in there just to spice things up (including a series by the ever delightful Tom of Finland), but I remember only one image (there may have been more, but, as I said, I skimmed over some parts of the book) including a non-white person. Neither of these things are enough to warrant the "universalis" in the title.

I think that in order to live better up to the "universal" part of the title, the material should have been less Eurocentric, less heterocentric and not so white, and there should have been more variety of artists - instead of 5 mediocre pieces by the same artist there could have been one good piece by each of 5 different artists. As it is, this looks less like a representative art book and more like the private wank-off collection of a middle-aged straight guy who's been lucky enough to get it published.

By the way, I don't think I have ever seen so many examples of bad women's anatomy gathered together in one place - especially front-facing vulvas.

Verdict: There is better erotica and better porn available, in better variety. If you're interested in either, I'm sure you know where to find them.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book 7: Shadow of the Sun by Ryszard Kapuściński (reading notes)

-This reads like fiction - prose more beautiful than one has come to expect from non-fiction and many of the chapters are structured like fiction stories. There is little continuity between most of the chapters, although some of the narratives or stories spread over more than one chapter. This is therefore more a collection of short narratives than a cohesive entirety. You could pick it up and read the chapters at random and still get a good sense of what is going on. -Here is an author who is not trying to find himself, recover from a broken heart, set a record, visit 30 countries in 3 weeks or build a perfectly enviable home in a perfectly enviable location, which is a rarity within travel literature, but of course Kapuściński was in Africa to work, and not to travel for spiritual, mental or entertainment purposes (he was the Polish Press Agency's Africa correspondent for nearly 30 years). -I have no way of knowing how well Kapuściński knew Africa - I have never been there...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...
25 comments
Read more

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...
9 comments
Read more