Skip to main content

Reading report, February 13, 2017


It's Monday! What Are You Reading? is hosted by Kathryn at the Book Date and is "a place to meet up and share what you have been, are and about to be reading over the week."

Visit the Book Date to see what various other book bloggers have been up to in the last week.
--



I didn't read much last week - didn't feel like making a push to finish any of the books I have been reading - but did finish one I have been steadily reading over the last couple of years:

1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die. This monster of a book is more than 900 pages long and I have been reading it bit by bit in the loo. It's funny (or perhaps not) that when I started it I was going "I've read that!" almost every time I turned a page, but after the 1920s these silent exclamations got fewer and fewer as I got closer to my own time, and I had only read a handful of the books published after 1990, although I own copies of several more that I plan to read when that mythical "one day" rolls around.

Much as I detest books and articles telling me I must do something, I found it interesting to see what books were chosen for inclusion in this volume. The edition I have is the original 2006 one, but I know the list has been changed in subsequent editions.

I figured it might be interesting to see how many of these books I have read, but I haven't been able to find the original 2006 list online and I am certainly not going to type it all up myself, so it will have to wait.

Its replacement in the loo is 1000 Places to See Before You Die. I expect that one will take at least a year to finish. I hope I may find some places in it that I deem worthy of visiting, but I am no more  going to start chasing those places than I am going to read all the books in 1001 Books....

I have started reading Shadow of the Silk Road by Colin Thubron and expect to finish that in rather less time than 1000 Places.... I am having slight doubts about whether or not to continue reading it (Thubron can be a bit hard to get into, as I experienced when I read one of his previous books), but I am planning to give it the 50-page treatment before deciding.



Labels:

Comments

Beth F said…
Ha! I'm the same way with those books. You can always tell when I was in grad school or starting my business, because those years are kind of empty in the "I've Read That" department. Sounds like a fun book to look through.
February 13, 2017 11:28 am
Rhea @ The Literary Phoenix said…
What an interesting choice to read! I've never really thought about reading a whole book about books to read! It must have added quite a few to your TBR list. :)

I hope you have a better reading week this week. :)
February 13, 2017 11:33 am
Deb Nance at Readerbuzz said…
I have a Google Doc of the 1001 list under the tab Perpetual Challenges. You can easily copy and paste the list from there, I think.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IZFWgGmm8BkWJ-5wExcHW5-btimCMNyKw26stuJEj-E
February 13, 2017 11:52 am
Vedika @ Poems and Poets said…
I've never really tried to read a catalog of "must-read" books. I've always chosen to scroll through infinite pages of reviews instead!
February 13, 2017 1:05 pm
Kathy Martin said…
I am not good at reading "should read" books because, I'll admit, my reading tastes are both eccentric and low brow. I like genre fiction. Come see my week here. Happy reading!
February 13, 2017 3:39 pm
Hopewell said…
Check the Goodreads group for reading these. Also https://1001bookreviews.com/the-1001-book-list/

It gets updated from time-to-time as you've seen. The Group on Goodreads votes on one to read each month. I don't usually finish them quickly so I don't commment in the group much. I keep track of those on the list that I read though.

Lisa @ https://hopewellslibraryoflife.wordpress.com/2017/02/13/the-mothers-by-britt-bennett/
February 13, 2017 8:43 pm
Greg said…
Seems like an interesting book. I wonder how many I've read (or want to read) would be in there...
February 14, 2017 2:14 am
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...
25 comments
Read more

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...
9 comments
Read more