Skip to main content

The annual reading report, part 2

Continuing from yesterday´s post:

Breakdown by genre:

This is by dominant genre, so that, for example, the urban fantasy novels I read all go in the romance category, because they are romances first and foremost, although they happen to take place in fantasy/alternative reality setting, whereas the Discworld books go in the fantasy category even if they are all also detective stories, because fantasy is the dominant genre.

Crime, mystery and thrillers: 54 (31,2%), down by 10,65%
Romance: 49 (28,3%), up by a staggering 21,15%
Fantasy, sci-fi, fairy tales, myths and supernatural: 20 (11,6%), up by 6,5%
Miscellaneous fiction: 32 (18,5%) up by 1,65%
Non-fiction: 18 (10,4%), down by 16,6%

My reading seems to have been more homogeneous in 2010 than it was in 2009, which I blame on the decrease in my reading of non-fiction, down to 10% from 27%.

I did not read enough travelogues and ex-pat memoirs to warrant a separate category in 2010, but I plan to remedy that in 2011, when the travelogues I accumulated in 2010 become eligible for the TBR challenge.


Authors:

I haven‘t tallied the number of books by the gender of the authors before, but I thought it might be interesting to take a look. Such numbers can, however, never be completely accurate, since for one reason or another authors sometimes assume noms de plum belonging to the other sex, or they have names or pseudonyms that are gender neutral.

Several books were by more than one author, including some short story anthologies, so I counted by the number of books rather than the number of authors.
10 (5,8%) anthologies with short stories by both genders ended up in a mixed category. As for the rest:

Female author(s): 107 (61,85%)
Male author(s): 56 (32,35%)

This is nearly twice as many books by women than by men, which actually surprised me (in a nice way). I'd had the impression that I read more books by men than by women.

Author list by number of books read:

As usual, Nora Roberts takes the trophy for the most books read by one author, with Lynn Viehl coming a close second and Jennifer Crusie a close third.

Nora Roberts: 11
Lynn Viehl: 9
Jennifer Crusie: 7
Terry Pratchett: 7
Georgette Heyer, Ngaio March and Ellis Peters: 6 each
J.K. Rowling, Hugleikur Dagsson: 5
Agatha Christie: 4
Edward Gorey, Lori Foster: 3 (the last books I shall ever read by Foster unless someone can point me in the direction of romances by her that do not have virgin heroines)
Dorothy L. Sayers, Halldór Laxness, Jane Feather, Julia Quinn, M.R. James, Sharyn McCrumb, Yrsa Sigurðardóttir: 2 each.

Of course, if I were to count all the little Gorey books collected in those three above-mentioned anthologies, he would win hands down with 47 books in total.

Publishers:
In my last annual report I switched to counting imprints rather than publishing houses, since smaller publishers are continually being swallowed up by bigger ones and what is a publishing house today may tomorrow be one imprint among many belonging to a big publishing house. I did count all the imprints bearing variations of the Penguin and Signet names as one.

As in 2009, Penguin won, but only by 1 book.

Penguin: 10
Signet: 9
St. Martin‘s Press: 8
Jove: 7
Bloomsbury: 6
Berkley Books, Fontana/Collins, Harper Collins, Project Gutenberg, Silhouette Books, Victor Gollancz, Vintage: 5 each, and
15 others with 2 books each, and
47 with 1 book each
Furthermore there were 6 self-published books, all of them e-books.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...