Skip to main content

Book rating system

This is the book rating system I used in my old reviews. I stopped assigning stars to books some time ago, because they were subjective and largely arbitrary. (I still assign them in my reading log, based on the likelihood of me rereading the book).

I rate books first and foremost on reading pleasure and ability to draw one into the story (i.e. on the level of escapism they offer). Technique, such as plot, characters, dialogue, etc., is an important consideration: I like plots to be solid, characters to be believable and dialogue natural, so if the plot is full of holes, the characters flat and the dialogue stilted, I generally don't enjoy a book, although if only one of these things is present, I may enjoy it but give it a lower rating.

I don't take into consideration what others think of the book or if it's classified as High Literature, Classic, Trash or something else. For the most part I leave the judgement of fine literary merit to academics and professional reviewers.

I am generally pretty good at judging which books I am going to like, so I rarely end up reading a less than 2 star book unless I come across a highly recommended must-read book that everyone else loves but I hate.

I opted for the 5 star system, as it seems to be the most common, and therefore the one most people are familiar with.

These are my criteria for giving star ratings to books:

5 stars: excellent, perfect or nearly perfect, must read, will probably keep it, will probably read it again (although see notes)
4 stars: good, highly recommended, a few flaws, strong contender for the keeper shelf, strong possibility that I will re-read it
3 stars: a decent read, nothing earth-shattering, several flaws, might re-read but will probably not
2 stars: mediocre, dull or badly flawed, would not read it again, sorry I bought it
1 star: waste of time, sorry I bought it, sorry I read it
0 stars: I want my money back and a reimbursement for the time wasted reading it

A plus (+) after a number means the book is not quite good enough for the next class above.

Notes:
Strangely enough, many of my favourite re-reads are four star books. Some of the 5 star ones are just too perfect to be read more than once, like when the plot hinges on the revelation of something, the pre-knowledge of which makes the book dull or uninteresting - but of course there are also 5 star books that I re-read periodically.

Popular posts from this blog

Reading report for January 2014

Here it is, finally: the reading report for January. (February‘s report is in the works: I have it entered into Excel and I just need to transfer it into Word, edit the layout and write the preface. It will either take a couple of days or a couple of months).

I finished 26 books in January, although admittedly a number of them were novellas. As I mentioned in my previous post, I delved into a new(ish) type of genre: gay (or M/M) romance. I found everything from genuinely sweet romance to hardcore BDSM, in sub-genres like fantasy, suspense and mystery and even a quartet of entertaining (and unlikely) rock star romances. Other books I read in January include the highly enjoyable memoir of cooking doyenne Julia Child, two straight romances, and Jennifer Worth‘s trilogy of memoirs about her experiences as a midwife in a London slum in the 1950s. I also watched the first season of the TV series based on these books and may (I say 'may') write something about this when I have finis…

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark:

Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines.


Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds.



Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap.



Fold the square diagonally in two. You…

Stiff – The curious lives of human cadavers

Originally published in November and December 2004, in 4 parts. Book 42 in my first 52 books challenge.

Author: Mary Roach
Year published: 2003
Pages: 303
Genre: Popular science, biology
Where got: amazon.co.uk

Mom, Dad, what happens after we die?

This is a classic question most parents dread having to answer. While this book doesn’t answer the philosophical/theological part of the question – what happens to the soul? - it does claim to contain answers to the biological part, namely: what happens to the body?



Reading progress for Stiff:
Stiff is proving to be an interesting read. Roach writes in a matter-of-fact journalistic style that makes the subject seem less grim than it really is, but she does on occasion become a bit too flippant about it, I guess in an attempt to distance herself. Although she uses humour to ease the grimness, the jokes – which, by the way, are never about the dead, only the living, especially Roach herself – often fall flat. Perhaps it’s just me, but this is a serio…