Skip to main content

Reading journal for Shirley, part 5, final entry, with SPOILERS


After I wrote the last entry I picked up the book again and read it more or less in one session.

Final thoughts: 
All the character descriptions are brilliant. Some characters are summed up in one pithy sentence or one short paragraph, and you know exactly what kind of people they are, and yet none of the primary or secondary characters are stereotypes, because their words and actions then take over and show them to be more than mere cardboard cut-outs. This takes skill. The disapproving Mrs. Yorke, for example, is shown to hate youth and beauty, but is perfectly capable of changing her mind about said youth and beauty when it is suffering (e.g. Mr. Moore), when she turns out to be a mother hen type.

There are passages that seem to serve no particular purpose, or which at least could have been shorter, but taken altogether the story does not sag badly at any time. It sails on at its own pace and gets there in the end. I am certain there are readers who would have wished the ending to be a bit less tidy, especially as narrative convention almost demands the death of Caroline Helstone. In fact there have been speculations that the original intention was to kill her off, but Charlotte drew back from it because she lost all her siblings while she was writing the book. Be that as it may, since none of the primary characters dies, Shirley makes a satisfying romantic read.

But it isn't just a romance. There are also speculations on social issues, such as on the responsibility of mill owners for the livelihoods of thousands of mill workers that were being shattered by industrial changes, on justice and religion, and especially on the position of women in society. Although the narrator (and presumably author) is firmly of the opinion that marriage is the best place for women (witness the rather miserable position of the two spinsters and the experiences of Mrs. Pryor before she was employed as Shirley's companion), it is clear that this only applies to marriages where both parties love and esteem one another. The marriages of both Helstone brothers end badly for their wives, one in death, the other in divorce followed by drudgery, and it is implied that this happened because the love in those unions was one-sided.

These two unions of people unsuited to one another are contrasted with the upcoming marriages of the Moore brothers with Caroline and Shirley. One side of each couple has been in danger of contracting a union unfit for them - Robert wooing Shirley for her money and Shirley being wooed by a young man who, while both richer and of a higher social status, would never be able to give her what she needs in a marriage, i.e. a man who can help her control her excesses of temperament. Shirley firmly prevents both mistakes from being made, and love finds its way, with the implication of, if not happily ever after, than at least happier than they might have been.
--

So far, of the two Brontë Project books I have read (not counting the two I read many years ago), the ranking is as follows:

For story, narrative technique and reading enjoyment: 
  1. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
  2. Shirley

For characters and quality of writing:
  1. Shirley
  2. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Icelandic folk-tale: The Laughing Merman

Icelanders not only believed in the existence of selkies, but also in mer-people. The mermaids were said to be very beautiful, while the mermen were supposed to be ugly as sin but very wise and able to see things others did not. O nce upon a time a farmer went out fishing and pulled up a merman. He tried to get the merman to talk to him but he would not answer, except to beg him to release him back into the sea, but this the farmer refused to do. The farmer rowed back to land, taking the captive merman with him. When he pulled up the boat on the shore, his wife came to him and greeted him with tenderness and kisses, which he received with pleasure. This made the merman laugh. Then the man’s dog came to him and greeted him tenderly in the way of dogs, by jumping up to him, but the farmer hit the dog. Again the merman laughed. Then the farmer walked up towards his house, but on the way he tripped over a tussock and hurt himself. He got angry and gave the tussock a good kicking. Then...

Book 7: Shadow of the Sun by Ryszard Kapuściński (reading notes)

-This reads like fiction - prose more beautiful than one has come to expect from non-fiction and many of the chapters are structured like fiction stories. There is little continuity between most of the chapters, although some of the narratives or stories spread over more than one chapter. This is therefore more a collection of short narratives than a cohesive entirety. You could pick it up and read the chapters at random and still get a good sense of what is going on. -Here is an author who is not trying to find himself, recover from a broken heart, set a record, visit 30 countries in 3 weeks or build a perfectly enviable home in a perfectly enviable location, which is a rarity within travel literature, but of course Kapuściński was in Africa to work, and not to travel for spiritual, mental or entertainment purposes (he was the Polish Press Agency's Africa correspondent for nearly 30 years). -I have no way of knowing how well Kapuściński knew Africa - I have never been there...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...