Skip to main content

Reading journal for Shirley, part 5, final entry, with SPOILERS

After I wrote the last entry I picked up the book again and read it more or less in one session.

Final thoughts: 
All the character descriptions are brilliant. Some characters are summed up in one pithy sentence or one short paragraph, and you know exactly what kind of people they are, and yet none of the primary or secondary characters are stereotypes, because their words and actions then take over and show them to be more than mere cardboard cut-outs. This takes skill. The disapproving Mrs. Yorke, for example, is shown to hate youth and beauty, but is perfectly capable of changing her mind about said youth and beauty when it is suffering (e.g. Mr. Moore), when she turns out to be a mother hen type.

There are passages that seem to serve no particular purpose, or which at least could have been shorter, but taken altogether the story does not sag badly at any time. It sails on at its own pace and gets there in the end. I am certain there are readers who would have wished the ending to be a bit less tidy, especially as narrative convention almost demands the death of Caroline Helstone. In fact there have been speculations that the original intention was to kill her off, but Charlotte drew back from it because she lost all her siblings while she was writing the book. Be that as it may, since none of the primary characters dies, Shirley makes a satisfying romantic read.

But it isn't just a romance. There are also speculations on social issues, such as on the responsibility of mill owners for the livelihoods of thousands of mill workers that were being shattered by industrial changes, on justice and religion, and especially on the position of women in society. Although the narrator (and presumably author) is firmly of the opinion that marriage is the best place for women (witness the rather miserable position of the two spinsters and the experiences of Mrs. Pryor before she was employed as Shirley's companion), it is clear that this only applies to marriages where both parties love and esteem one another. The marriages of both Helstone brothers end badly for their wives, one in death, the other in divorce followed by drudgery, and it is implied that this happened because the love in those unions was one-sided.

These two unions of people unsuited to one another are contrasted with the upcoming marriages of the Moore brothers with Caroline and Shirley. One side of each couple has been in danger of contracting a union unfit for them - Robert wooing Shirley for her money and Shirley being wooed by a young man who, while both richer and of a higher social status, would never be able to give her what she needs in a marriage, i.e. a man who can help her control her excesses of temperament. Shirley firmly prevents both mistakes from being made, and love finds its way, with the implication of, if not happily ever after, than at least happier than they might have been.

So far, of the two Brontë Project books I have read (not counting the two I read many years ago), the ranking is as follows:

For story, narrative technique and reading enjoyment: 
  1. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
  2. Shirley

For characters and quality of writing:
  1. Shirley
  2. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall


Popular posts from this blog

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down

List love: 10 recommended stories with cross-dressing characters

This trope is almost as old as literature, what with Achilles, Hercules and Athena all cross-dressing in the Greek myths, Thor and Odin disguising themselves as women in the Norse myths, and Arjuna doing the same in the Mahabaratha. In modern times it is most common in romance novels, especially historicals in which a heroine often spends part of the book disguised as a boy, the hero sometimes falling for her while thinking she is a boy. Occasionally a hero will cross-dress, using a female disguise to avoid recognition or to gain access to someplace where he would never be able to go as a man. However, the trope isn’t just found in romances, as may be seen in the list below, in which I recommend stories with a variety of cross-dressing characters. Unfortunately I was only able to dredge up from the depths of my memory two book-length stories I had read in which men cross-dress, so this is mostly a list of women dressed as men. Ghost Riders by Sharyn McCrumb. One of the interwove

First book of 2020: The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel by Deborah Moggach (reading notes)

I don't know if I've mentioned it before, but I loathe movie tie-in book covers because I feel they are (often) trying to tell me how I should see the characters in the book. The edition of Deborah Moggach's These Foolish Things that I read takes it one step further and changes the title of the book into the title of the film version as well as having photos of the ensemble cast on the cover. Fortunately it has been a long while since I watched the movie, so I couldn't even remember who played whom in the film, and I think it's perfectly understandable to try to cash in on the movie's success by rebranding the book. Even with a few years between watching the film and reading the book, I could see that the story had been altered, e.g. by having the Marigold Hotel's owner/manager be single and having a romance, instead being of unhappily married to an (understandably, I thought) shrewish wife. It also conflates Sonny, the wheeler dealer behind the retireme