Skip to main content

Late to the party as usual: Discussion of Twilight by Stephenie Meyer

Disclaimer: I don’t think I really need to summarise this one, since it is so widely known. But in case you haven’t read it, be warned that the following discussion is full of SPOILERS and should not be read by persons who wish to be surprised by the book. I don’t want to call this a review, but there are some review elements in there nonetheless.

When a book gets as hyped up as Twilight I tend to recoil from it rather than jump on the bandwagon and read it right away. This is not because I don’t like hype, but because I hate buying books at full price and then discovering I don’t like them. I’d much rather wait until I can read a book and then decide if I want to own a copy, which I can, by that time, probably get second hand. Foreign bestsellers don’t arrive immediately in the libraries here, and I don’t know a lot of people who read foreign books, so unless I buy them, I can’t read them right away.

I had decided, as much as a couple of years ago, that I wanted to read Twilight, mostly because of the hysterical reactions to it. So many young readers, especially girls, thought it was the best thing ever, and then the inevitable backlash came: it was anti-feminist, Edward was a creepy stalker and Bella a perpetual victim, it was badly written, it was trash, etc. etc. Flame wars erupted on reading forums and anti-twilighters told stories about being menaced or even attacked by rabid Twilight fangirls, who vehemently denied the accusations. I watched all of this from a safe distance and thoroughly enjoyed the show without getting involved.

What really captured my attention and aroused my interest was the statement I heard from more than one adult reader saying – in different ways – that it was trash, but the kind of trash that sucks you in and keeps you reading until you finish it, and then you get a reading hangover, recover from it and immediately want more, sort of like junk food or candy. Now that I have finally read it, I tend to (guardedly) agree with this. This is quality trash, eminently readable much in the same way as Charlaine Harris’ Sookie Stackhouse books, the books of Sidney Sheldon or those of Jackie Collins.

These are books you don’t read for the prose – you read them for the story, and Stephenie Meyer, using Bella Swan’s voice, is one hell of a good storyteller. The writing may be somewhat clunky and over-descriptive at times, and some of the themes may indeed be anti-feminist and some of this stuff is just over the top (sparkly vampires, anyone?), but the story is a classic one about a love so breathtaking and (to the lovers) perfect that it can only be experienced once in a lifetime. Of course it adds complications and tragic overtones that the male half of the loving couple is a nearly immortal vampire and the female is mortal, but what drives the story is exactly the conflict this causes: the what-ifs and the hows and whys. Then Meyer adds a thriller element and off we go on a whirling ride, full of teenage angst and hormones, which Meyer captures perfectly.

For the people who think these books are giving girls a bad example of what a romantic relationship should be like I have this to say: trust the girls and young women who exclaim on Edward’s hotness and the perfection of his relationship with Bella to know the difference between fiction and reality and what they can and can not have. After all, most people who read serial killer stories at that age have the good sense to not become serial killers, so why should you think girls are going to strive for the kind of relationship Bella and Edward have and be disappointed just because they end up in relationships that don’t echo that relationship?

I have to add that while Bella is a believable character (I can find aspects of her in most of my friends and myself), Edward is just too much of a Gary Stu to be likable. There seems to be no end to his physical perfection and he seems to be able to do anything better that anyone (except I bet he can’t cook). He is even ready to sacrifice the relationship to keep her safe, even if she is the most delectable thing he has ever smelled. In short, he is the kind of boyfriend teenage girls and even grown women like to fantasise about, because we know damn well they don’t exist in reality. This gets annoying after a while, but then I remember that this is not necessarily how Meyer has envisaged him, but how her narrator, Bella, who is head-over-heels in love with him, sees him, and I begin to wonder if Bella isn’t an unreliable narrator? I guess I’ll have to read the other books to find out.

Readers, if you have thoughts or comments you would like to share with me, please post them below.

P.S. The movie is okay, follows the story quite faithfully except for a few details.Both Bella and Edward seem to be pouting most of the time, and on top of that he is just very, very creepy.

Comments

George said…
One of my friends read TWILIGHT and said it was the worst book he'd ever read. My daughter read TWILIGHT (because all her friends read it) and she said it was dreadful. Yet, the series sells millions of copies. The movies make millions. The NY TIMES stated that 20% of all books sold in the U.S. are by Stephanie Meyer. Amazing!
Bibliophile said…
I wouldn't exactly call it dreadful, but I have certainly read better books, even better trashy books for that matter. I was actually surprised that it was able to arouse such strong emotions in so many people, because it is just mediocre. You still want to know what happens next, which is why I say Meyer knows how to tell a story in such a way as to capture the reader. I am, however going to refrain from reading more, because, truth be told, I prefer more adult paranormal fiction.

Popular posts from this blog

Reading report for January 2014

Here it is, finally: the reading report for January. (February‘s report is in the works: I have it entered into Excel and I just need to transfer it into Word, edit the layout and write the preface. It will either take a couple of days or a couple of months).

I finished 26 books in January, although admittedly a number of them were novellas. As I mentioned in my previous post, I delved into a new(ish) type of genre: gay (or M/M) romance. I found everything from genuinely sweet romance to hardcore BDSM, in sub-genres like fantasy, suspense and mystery and even a quartet of entertaining (and unlikely) rock star romances. Other books I read in January include the highly enjoyable memoir of cooking doyenne Julia Child, two straight romances, and Jennifer Worth‘s trilogy of memoirs about her experiences as a midwife in a London slum in the 1950s. I also watched the first season of the TV series based on these books and may (I say 'may') write something about this when I have finis…

Stiff – The curious lives of human cadavers

Originally published in November and December 2004, in 4 parts. Book 42 in my first 52 books challenge.

Author: Mary Roach
Year published: 2003
Pages: 303
Genre: Popular science, biology
Where got: amazon.co.uk

Mom, Dad, what happens after we die?

This is a classic question most parents dread having to answer. While this book doesn’t answer the philosophical/theological part of the question – what happens to the soul? - it does claim to contain answers to the biological part, namely: what happens to the body?



Reading progress for Stiff:
Stiff is proving to be an interesting read. Roach writes in a matter-of-fact journalistic style that makes the subject seem less grim than it really is, but she does on occasion become a bit too flippant about it, I guess in an attempt to distance herself. Although she uses humour to ease the grimness, the jokes – which, by the way, are never about the dead, only the living, especially Roach herself – often fall flat. Perhaps it’s just me, but this is a serio…

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark:

Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines.


Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds.



Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap.



Fold the square diagonally in two. You…