Skip to main content

Signing-up post for the Nonfiction Challenge 2016


I came to the realisation some time ago that I was slacking off in my reading. It's not that I have been reading any fewer books than usual, but that, given a choice, I have been going for the less demanding books: short rather than long, easy subjects over hard, entertainment over substance etc., like choosing dessert every time and ignoring the main course. Of course every reader needs the equivalent of dessert every now and then, but such books don't provide the mental nourishment and challenges that can be had from the literary equivalent of a main dish. 

For example, I haven't read, or indeed touched, a science book in months, and looking at my reading log I find I have only read three non-fiction books this year. Of those, one is a collection of quotations and another a photography book. This is out of 117 books read so far, when non-fiction has usually been somewhere in the 12-15% range of my overall reading each year. Plus, I haven't read a single book, fiction or non-, longer than 400 pages since some time last year.

Nonfiction Reading Challenge hosted at The Introverted ReaderIt's too late in the year to be thinking of a challenge to read long books, but when I realised that several of the possible reads for the What’s in a Name challenge I signed up for on Friday were non-fiction, I decided to sign up for a non-fiction reading challenge as well and chose this one: Nonfiction Reading Challenge 2016.

I’m signing up for the Dilettante level to begin with, but if it goes well I’ll level up to Explorer. 

Although some of the books I found could be used for both challenges, I decided to keep them separate.

The rest of the very simple rules can be found in the sign-up post on the hosting blog.

Dilettante--Read 1-5 non-fiction books:
Planning to read:
Blood River: A Journey to Africa's Broken Heart by Tim Butcher
Bon Appétit! Travels through France with knife, fork and corkscrew by Peter Mayle
Am reading:
The Beckoning Silence by Joe Simpson
Additional reads: Non-fiction books I have started to read and then put aside for one reason or another, and/or rejects from the other challenge.
Explorer--Read 6-10:
Rejects from the other challenge and additional books as needed.
--

Edit (28.08.2016):
Books read so far:
The Beckoning Silence by Joe Simpson
Bon Appétit! Travels through France with knife, fork and corkscrew by Peter Mayle
Blood River: A Journey to Africa’s Broken Heart by Tim Butcher
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...
25 comments
Read more

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...
9 comments
Read more