Skip to main content

Bibliophile reviews The Barbie Chronicles: A living doll turns forty

Editor: Yona Zeldis McDonough
Year published: 1999
Pages: 240
Genre: social history

Like millions of other girls across the world, I had a Barbie when I was little. I think she was a Superstar. She came in a hot pink gown with spaghetti straps, had rigid bent arms with a scary hole through one hand for a huge ring that quickly got lost, and similar huge earrings, the removal of which left gaping holes that obliterated her earlobes. Before long, one arm was broken off at the elbow – I don’t remember how it happened, but I may well have been trying to unbend her unnaturally angled arm. After my brother broke the pin that attached her head to her torso by hitting her hard with his He-Man action figure, she was never the same, and one day she was gone. I never missed her. I certainly never felt I was expected to become a Barbie Superstar. I never even wanted to be blonde, let alone have DD breasts. As an adult I discovered that the pretty doll with the vacant stare and impossibly thick hair I had had as a child was a controversial figure.

This collection of essays covers some of that controversy, but it also has essays by Barbie’s fans and people who see her as an interesting social phenomenon rather than as a dangerous role model or positive image for girls. There is even some poetry. The essays will give everyone, both fans and enemies, something to think about.

Rating: A collection of essays about the doll everyone seems to have an opinion about. Not rated.

Comments

Maxine Clarke said…
I was not allowed a Barbie doll when I was a girl. Everyone in my class seemed to have one, or if not, the far less trendy Sindy (a UK rip-off).
I therefore vowed that if/when I had children of the Barbie-desiring persuasion, they could have them. And they did.
One thing I noticed, that Mattel sells a very basic Barbie very cheap (3.99 pounds in UK) -- which everyone buys for little girls for about their 4th birthday (if not the actual parent, one of the girl's friends). Then, of course, the child is programmed to want the "other" Barbies, ie the ones that cost a minimum of 15 pounds and have some themed outfit -- sleeping beauty, fashion model, axe murderer (oops), etc.

Another thing I notice, that when a girl actually obtains one of these monstrosities and takes its clothes off for the first time in whatever "game" they are playing, that's it. That Barbie never has its appeal --- the girl just wants the next marketed doll (fantasy wedding carriage Barbie, mother of twins Barbie etc).

Ages ago I went to a Barbie doll exhibition at the London Toy Museum with a little girl (before I had my own children). There were loads of 1950s Barbie dolls, but without exception they were "air hostess", "nurse" and various other "assistants" to glam male (Kens) doctors, pilots etc. At least these days they do have Barbie vets, astronauts, etc, although, darn it, the girls who buy them still prefer the Barbie Rapunzel or cheerleader. (Do they have a gay Barbie? Must do I suppose --- but is she featured in the book?)

Are you back reading again or is this Barbie review an ironic comment?

All the best
Maxine.
Bibliophile said…
Quote: "Another thing I notice, that when a girl actually obtains one of these monstrosities and takes its clothes off for the first time in whatever "game" they are playing, that's it. That Barbie never has its appeal --- the girl just wants the next marketed doll..." Unquote.

A couple of the essayists made the exact same comment, that the appeal was in the clothes or the hair, and once the doll had been dressed and its hair combed a couple of times, that was it. I never felt I could do much with a doll whose elbows were stuck at a 90 degree angle.

I came to the conclusion that the reader's block was due to genre overload - too many mysteries - so I grabbed a couple of non-fiction books. Since I'm interested in social history and crochet a lot of doll clothes (very popular presents, especially the wedding gowns), I figured it would be interesting to get to know a bit more about the dolls I've been making clothes for. (The book, BTW, is not Mattel approved...)

I'm now working on the next mystery author review.

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...