Skip to main content

What's in a Name challenge review #6: 1968 by Mark Kurlansky

What's in a Name challenge category: A number in figures in the title 
Author: Mark Kurlansky.

Full title: 1968: The Year that Rocked the World
Genre: History
Published: 2004

One would think that finding a book with a number in the title would be easy in a book collection as large as mine, but it wasn't. I only found two among my 700+ TBR stack and ended up reading this one because my second-hand copy of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 was so musty that I started sneezing after reading a couple of pages.
 
The year 1968 was a pivotal, tumultuous year in history, full of student riots, protests, massacres, the assassinations of public figures, the Vietnam war and the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, with the Cold War as a backdrop for the whole thing.

Kurlansky has drawn all of this together into a solid, interesting book. Unlike two previous books of his that I have read, Cod and Salt, it does not begin to feel rushed towards the end, and this is a good thing because I hate it when non-fiction writers spend 3/4 of the book discussing some aspect or time period in slow motion and then suddenly shift into fifth and rush the ending. This book continues at the same steady, relatively fast pace all the way through and manages to convey, if not all the history of 1968, then at least a sense of the atmosphere and an overview of important events and people. It is designed more to whet one's appetite for more specifics rather than to be a definitive history of an interesting year.

Reams of books have been written about the events of 1968, some wide-ranging and others focusing on one particular country, event or person. A number of them made it into the bibliography, and I will be perusing that to see if I find books about the things that especially interested me in this book.

This book is very fact-heavy and I mostly read it while eating breakfast and dinner in my kitchen, so you could say that for the last couple of months I have been digesting it little by little. Unfortunately, trying to read it at bedtime inevitably brought on the yawns after a few pages - not because it is boring, but because it is so packed with names and facts that my brain needed to be fully alert to follow everything that was happening on the page, and not winding down after the day.

This is not a fun read, but it is an interesting one. It details some of the many things human beings do to each other in the name of one ideology or another, but also the hope that springs eternal in humans that change can be achieved if they only try hard enough.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to make a simple origami bookmark

Here are some instructions on how to make a simple origami (paper folding) bookmark: Take a square of paper. It can be patterned origami paper, gift paper or even office paper, just as long as it’s easy to fold. The square should not be much bigger than 10 cm/4 inches across, unless you intend to use the mark for a big book. The images show what the paper should look like after you follow each step of the instructions. The two sides of the paper are shown in different colours to make things easier, and the edges and fold lines are shown as black lines. Fold the paper in half diagonally (corner to corner), and then unfold. Repeat with the other two corners. This is to find the middle and to make the rest of the folding easier. If the paper is thick or stiff it can help to reverse the folds. Fold three of the corners in so that they meet in the middle. You now have a piece of paper resembling an open envelope. For the next two steps, ignore the flap. Fold the square diagonally in two. Yo...

Book 40: The Martian by Andy Weir, audiobook read by Wil Wheaton

Note : This will be a general scattershot discussion about my thoughts on the book and the movie, and not a cohesive review. When movies are based on books I am interested in reading but haven't yet read, I generally wait to read the book until I have seen the movie, but when a movie is made based on a book I have already read, I try to abstain from rereading the book until I have seen the movie. The reason is simple: I am one of those people who can be reduced to near-incoherent rage when a movie severely alters the perfectly good story line of a beloved book, changes the ending beyond recognition or adds unnecessarily to the story ( The Hobbit , anyone?) without any apparent reason. I don't mind omissions of unnecessary parts so much (I did not, for example, become enraged to find Tom Bombadil missing from The Lord of the Rings ), because one expects that - movies based on books would be TV-series long if they tried to include everything, so the material must be pared down ...

Bibliophile discusses Van Dine’s rules for writing detective stories

Writers have been putting down advice for wannabe writers for centuries, about everything from how to captivate readers to how to build a story and write believable characters to getting published. The mystery genre has had its fair share, and one of the best known advisory essays is mystery writer’s S.S. Van Dine’s 1928 piece “Twenty rules for writing detective stories.” I mentioned in one of my reviews that I might write about these rules. Well, I finally gave myself the time to do it. First comes the rule (condensed), then what I think about it. Here are the Rules as Van Dine wrote them . (Incidentally, check out the rest of this excellent mystery reader’s resource: Gaslight ) The rules are meant to apply to whodunnit amateur detective fiction, but the main ones can be applied to police and P.I. fiction as well. I will discuss them mostly in this context, but will also mention genres where the rules don’t apply and authors who have successfully and unsuccessfully broken the rules. 1...